The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 4.0x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 4.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 4.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2026
License
Unknown
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 5.1x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

270.2B diff

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 270.2B more parameters than GLM-5.3, making it 35.9% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
1.0Tparameters
753.0B
GLM-5.3
1023.2B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-5.3's 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.

GLM-5.3 is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to MiMo-V2.5-Pro in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 3.2x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.43/M), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.