The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3 4B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -1.7.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -1.7, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
-1.7
#325
Coding
35.6
#25
-4.3
#246
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.04 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 26 for Gemma 3 4B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3 4Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 4B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 days ago

1.5yr newer
Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3 4B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Gemma 3 4B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -1.7. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Gemma 3 4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Gemma 3 4B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3 4B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3 4B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs -1.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons