The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3n E2B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to -10.1.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.3 to -10.1, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.3 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.3
#46
-10.1
#364
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 11 for Gemma 3n E2B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemma 3n E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

6 days ago

1.2yr newer
Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Gemma 3n E2B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to -10.1. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.3 vs -10.1), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons