The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to -5.2.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to -5.2, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
-5.2
#356
Coding
33.1
#36
-0.1
#241
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 28 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to -5.2. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs -5.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons