The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 4 E2B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 6.8.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 6.8, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.3 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 4 E2B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Gemma 4 E2B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.3
#46
6.8
#289
Agents
31.5
#28
-3.6
#177
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 11 for Gemma 4 E2B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 4 E2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 4 E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemma 4 E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 4 E2B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 E2B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

6 days ago

5mo newer
Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E2B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 4 E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Gemma 4 E2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemma 4 E2B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Gemma 4 E2B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 6.8. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Gemma 4 E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Gemma 4 E2B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Gemma 4 E2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.3 vs 6.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons