The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Kimi-k1.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 17.3.

Google · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 17.3, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you are already invested in the Moonshot AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
17.3
#205
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 9 for Kimi-k1.5

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Kimi-k1.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 20 months newer than Kimi-k1.5.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 days ago

1.6yr newer
Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Kimi-k1.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 17.3. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Kimi-k1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs 17.3), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Kimi-k1.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons