The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs LFM2.5-2.6B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 19.0.

Google · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 19.0, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose LFM2.5-2.6B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
LFM2.5-2.6B
Liquid AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
19.0
#208
Coding
33.1
#36
17.4
#121
Agents
29.8
#35
7.9
#135
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 9 for LFM2.5-2.6B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and LFM2.5-2.6Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while LFM2.5-2.6B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

LFM2.5-2.6B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while LFM2.5-2.6B was released on 2026-08-04.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 1 month newer than LFM2.5-2.6B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

4w newer
LFM2.5-2.6B

Aug 4, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and LFM2.5-2.6B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
LFM2.5-2.6B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs LFM2.5-2.6B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or LFM2.5-2.6B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 19.0. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and LFM2.5-2.6B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to LFM2.5-2.6B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. LFM2.5-2.6B scores Multi-IF: 80.1%, PinchBench: 68.2%, Claw-Eval: 62.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 59.4%, IFBench: 59.2%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and LFM2.5-2.6B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 19.0), licensing (Proprietary vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and LFM2.5-2.6B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI.

Related comparisons