The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 0.7.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 0.7, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
42.4
#46
0.7
#312
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 23 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

1.9yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 0.7. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs 0.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.