The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MedGemma 4B IT

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to -4.5.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.3 to -4.5, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.3 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MedGemma 4B IT

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.3
#46
-4.5
#347
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 7 for MedGemma 4B IT

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MedGemma 4B ITdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

MedGemma 4B IT can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 16 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

6 days ago

1.3yr newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MedGemma 4B IT side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MedGemma 4B IT
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MedGemma 4B IT?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to -4.5. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MedGemma 4B IT is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.3 vs -4.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons