The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiniCPM-SALA

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 14.4.

Google · OpenBMB · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 14.4, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
MiniCPM-SALA
OpenBMB
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
14.4
#236
Coding
33.1
#36
21.0
#94
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 24 for MiniCPM-SALA

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniCPM-SALAdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniCPM-SALA uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 7 months newer than MiniCPM-SALA.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

6mo newer
MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniCPM-SALA side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MiniCPM-SALA
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiniCPM-SALA.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiniCPM-SALA?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 14.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to MiniCPM-SALA in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniCPM-SALA?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 14.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiniCPM-SALA?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB.

Related comparisons