The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.1 to 26.9.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.1 to 26.9, ranking #52 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.1 and ranks #52 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
41.1
#52
26.9
#144
Coding
35.0
#30
23.7
#74
Agents
31.1
#31
9.2
#128
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$7.50 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 11 for Mistral Medium 3.5

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Mistral Medium 3.5 specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Medium 3.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Mistral Medium 3.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Medium 3.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Medium 3.5 uses Modified MIT License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Medium 3.5

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Mistral Medium 3.5 was released on 2026-04-29.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 4 months newer than Mistral Medium 3.5.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer
Mistral Medium 3.5

Apr 29, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Mistral Medium 3.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Mistral Medium 3.5.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.1 to 26.9. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Mistral Medium 3.5 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Mistral Medium 3.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores COLLIE: 95.8%, Tau3 Telecom: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 86.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.6%, Tau3 Retail: 76.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.1 vs 26.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Modified MIT License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Mistral Medium 3.5 is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons