The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs o1-mini

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 10.2.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 10.2, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.7 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o1-mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $12.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
o1-mini
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.7
#44
10.2
#253
Coding
36.1
#25
14.5
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$12.00 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 6 for o1-mini

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and o1-minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1-mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only o1-mini specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 24 months newer than o1-mini.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

2.0yr newer
o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and o1-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
o1-mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs o1-mini.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or o1-mini?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 10.2. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and o1-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to o1-mini in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and o1-mini?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and o1-mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and o1-mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.7 vs 10.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and o1-mini?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and o1-mini is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons