The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 8.1.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 8.1, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
QvQ-72B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
8.1
#271
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

QvQ-72B-Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

QvQ-72B-Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 21 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.7yr newer
QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or QvQ-72B-Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 8.1. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 8.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons