The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 2.3.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 2.3, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
2.3
#304
Coding
35.6
#24
10.1
#157
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

2.0yr newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 2.3. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 2.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons