The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.5-9B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 24.7.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 24.7, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.5-9B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Qwen3.5-9B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
24.7
#160
Agents
29.8
#35
8.4
#131
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 25 for Qwen3.5-9B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.5-9Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-9B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-9B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-9B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.5-9B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Qwen3.5-9B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-9B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-9B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen3.5-9B was released on 2026-03-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 6 months newer than Qwen3.5-9B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

6mo newer
Qwen3.5-9B

Mar 2, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.5-9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.5-9B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen3.5-9B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 24.7. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Qwen3.5-9B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen3.5-9B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Qwen3.5-9B scores IFEval: 91.5%, MMLU-Redux: 91.1%, C-Eval: 88.2%, MAXIFE: 83.4%, Global PIQA: 83.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.5-9B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.5-9B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.5-9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 24.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.5-9B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen3.5-9B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons