The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 42.5.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 42.5, ranking #43 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
42.9
#43
Coding
35.6
#24
30.8
#45
Agents
31.5
#26
24.4
#47
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.32 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.28 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.7-Plusdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 3 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

3mo newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 42.5. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 42.9), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons