The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.8-27B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B are closely matched at 40.3 and 45.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.3 and 45.1.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Qwen3.8-27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
45.1
#31
Coding
33.1
#36
31.6
#41
Agents
29.8
#35
30.9
#33
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 26 for Qwen3.8-27B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8-27B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.8-27B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Qwen3.8-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 1 month newer than Qwen3.8-27B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

2w newer
Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Qwen3.8-27B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.3 and 45.1. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 45.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Qwen3.8-27B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons