The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Step 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 30.2.

Google · StepFun · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 30.2, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Step 3.7 Flash

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
30.2
#120
Coding
33.1
#36
19.9
#99
Agents
29.8
#35
13.5
#92
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.15 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 4 for Step 3.7 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Step 3.7 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Step 3.7 Flash specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Step 3.7 Flash specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
StepFun
Step 3.7 Flash
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Step 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Step 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Step 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Step 3.7 Flash uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Step 3.7 Flash

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Step 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-06-10.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 3 months newer than Step 3.7 Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

2mo newer
Step 3.7 Flash

Jun 10, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Step 3.7 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Step 3.7 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Step 3.7 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to 30.2. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Step 3.7 Flash is made by StepFun. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Step 3.7 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Step 3.7 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 59.5%, SWE-Bench Pro: 56.3%, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools, text-only): 47.2%, GDPval: 45.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Step 3.7 Flash supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Step 3.7 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs 30.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Step 3.7 Flash is developed by StepFun.

Related comparisons