The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.3 to -5.2.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.3 to -5.2, ranking #14 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.3 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.3
#14
-5.2
#345
Reasoning
47.2
#23
-5.3
#334
Coding
39.9
#12
3.0
#211
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Gemini 3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 16 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.3 to -5.2. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.3 vs -5.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons