The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -5.8.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -5.8, ranking #43 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Muse Spark Open
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.8
#382
44.9
#43
Reasoning
-5.8
#372
45.2
#39
Coding
2.9
#243
33.0
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Muse Spark Open
Math
-5.8#330
31.6#69
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 17 for Muse Spark Open

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Spark Opendon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

809.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 809.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 11557.1% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
816.0B
Muse Spark Open

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark Open specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark Open supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Muse Spark Open can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.

Muse Spark Open is 18 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -5.8. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Spark Open?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.8 vs 44.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Spark Open?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons