The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4 Fast

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 32.0. Grok 4 Fast is 5.5x cheaper per token.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 32.0, ranking #15 overall.

On price, Grok 4 Fast is roughly 5.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4 Fast also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • cost matters — it's about 5.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.0
#15
32.0
#101
46.9
#24
31.1
#103
39.3
#14
18.3
#106
35.8
#16
3.7
#151
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,048,576
2,000,000

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 7 for Grok 4 Fast

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4 Fastdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok 4 Fast costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 3.8x more expensive than Grok 4 Fast ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than Grok 4 Fast ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than Grok 4 Fast.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4 Fast accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.8 Flash's 1,048,576 tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Grok 4 Fast is limited to 30,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4 Fast support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 12 months newer than Grok 4 Fast.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

1.0yr newer
Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Grok 4 Fast's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok 4 Fast's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Grok 4 Fast

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. Grok 4 Fast is available from xAI.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Grok 4 Fast

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4 Fast side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Grok 4 Fast
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4 Fast.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4 Fast?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 32.0. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to Grok 4 Fast in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is 3.8x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4 Fast?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4 Fast?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 32.0), context window (1.0M vs 2.0M), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4 Fast?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI.