Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hermes 3 70B
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.2 to 4.1. Hermes 3 70B is 2.1x cheaper per token.
Google · Nous Research · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.2 to 4.1, ranking #12 overall.
On price, Hermes 3 70B is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.2 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Hermes 3 70B
- cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 17 for Hermes 3 70B
Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hermes 3 70Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 5.4x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than Hermes 3 70B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. Hermes 3 70B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3.8 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.
Gemini 3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Hermes 3 70B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 25 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Sep 2, 2026
6 days ago
2.0yr newerAug 15, 2024
2.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date.
Mar 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Hermes 3 70B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hermes 3 70B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hermes 3 70B.