Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 8.1. Llama 4 Scout is 11.1x cheaper per token.
Google · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 8.1, ranking #11 overall.
On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 11.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Llama 4 Scout
- cost matters — it's about 11.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 12 for Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 4 Scoutdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 9.4x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.8 Flash's 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.8 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Llama 4 Scout
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.
Sep 2, 2026
0 days ago
1.4yr newerApr 5, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.
Mar 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Llama 4 Scout
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout.