The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 7.3.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 7.3, ranking #203 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.8 and ranks #203 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
7.3
#309
21.8
#203
Reasoning
6.1
#312
19.6
#216
Coding
0.3
#263
2.8
#244
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.08 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
10,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 4 Scout
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
12.8#243
12.1#246
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

105.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 105.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 2625.0% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 19 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

6 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Scout
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 7.3. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.3 vs 21.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons