The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.5 to 30.7. MiMo-V2-Flash is 10.0x cheaper per token.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.5 to 30.7, ranking #17 overall.

On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 10.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.5 and ranks #17 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 10.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.5
#17
30.7
#117
Reasoning
46.9
#25
30.8
#113
Coding
38.6
#15
17.5
#118
Agents
35.6
#18
8.1
#134
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
1,048,576
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.8 Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash
Tool use
27.0#25
6.3#147
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 15 for MiMo-V2-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Gemini 3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 9 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

8mo newer
MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.5 to 30.7. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to MiMo-V2-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is 7.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.5 vs 30.7), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons