The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.3 to 6.9.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.3 to 6.9, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.3 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.3
#14
6.9
#280
Reasoning
47.2
#23
3.5
#287
Agents
36.3
#15
-2.8
#166
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Vision
34.0#12
5.1#152
Multimodal
35.0#11
7.3#126
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

1 shared

Gemini 3.8 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LVBench), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 19 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.3 to 6.9. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.3 vs 6.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons