The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs TTS-1 HD

Comparing Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose TTS-1 HD

  • you are already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.75 / M
$7500000.00 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,024

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 0 for TTS-1 HD

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HDdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 10000000.0x cheaper than TTS-1 HD ($7500000.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, TTS-1 HD is more expensive than Gemini 3.8 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
TTS-1 HD
Input tokens$7500000.00
Output tokensunknown
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to TTS-1 HD's 1,024 tokens. Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
TTS-1 HD
Input1,024 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

TTS-1 HD

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

TTS-1 HD

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while TTS-1 HD's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without TTS-1 HD's release date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

TTS-1 HD

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while TTS-1 HD's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without TTS-1 HD's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

TTS-1 HD

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. TTS-1 HD is available from OpenAI.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

TTS-1 HD

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $7500000.00/1MOutput Price:Output: N/A/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
TTS-1 HD
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs TTS-1 HD.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or TTS-1 HD?

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and TTS-1 HD (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to TTS-1 HD in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than TTS-1 HD?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 10000000.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. TTS-1 HD costs $7500000.00/M input via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and TTS-1 HD supports 1K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1K), input pricing ($0.75 vs $7500000.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and TTS-1 HD?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and TTS-1 HD is developed by OpenAI.