The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs TTS-1 HD

Comparing MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Xiaomi · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose TTS-1 HD

  • you are already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.43 / M
$7500000.00 / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,024

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 0 for TTS-1 HD

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HDdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 17241379.3x cheaper than TTS-1 HD ($7500000.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, TTS-1 HD is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
OpenAI
TTS-1 HD
Input tokens$7500000.00
Output tokensunknown
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to TTS-1 HD's 1,024 tokens.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
TTS-1 HD
Input1,024 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

TTS-1 HD

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while TTS-1 HD uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

TTS-1 HD

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while TTS-1 HD's release date is not specified.

We can confirm MiMo-V2.6-Pro's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without TTS-1 HD's release date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

TTS-1 HD

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi. TTS-1 HD is available from OpenAI.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M

TTS-1 HD

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $7500000.00/1MOutput Price:Output: N/A/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
TTS-1 HD
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs TTS-1 HD.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or TTS-1 HD?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) and TTS-1 HD (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to TTS-1 HD in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper than TTS-1 HD?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 17241379.3x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi. TTS-1 HD costs $7500000.00/M input via openai.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and TTS-1 HD supports 1K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1K), input pricing ($0.43 vs $7500000.00/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and TTS-1 HD?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and TTS-1 HD is developed by OpenAI.