The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 34.5.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 34.5, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
34.5
#104
Reasoning
52.4
#7
34.0
#103
Coding
44.1
#4
21.6
#96
Agents
40.5
#4
15.9
#94
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Muse Glimmer-30B
Vision
36.8#8
20.5#77
Tool use
30.6#6
13.6#107
Multimodal
36.9#8
23.6#63
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Glimmer-30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Gemini 4 Argon is 2 months newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 4 Argon

—

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 34.5. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 34.5), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons