Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer-30B
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 34.5.
InclusionAI · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 34.5, ranking #15 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Muse Glimmer-30B
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B
Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SkillsBench), while Muse Glimmer-30B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Ling 3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Ling 3.1 Flash has 530.4B more parameters than Muse Glimmer-30B, making it 1791.9% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Muse Glimmer-30B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.
Muse Glimmer-30B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ling 3.1 Flash
Muse Glimmer-30B
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.
Ling 3.1 Flash is 2 months newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.
Sep 30, 2026
1 weeks ago
1mo newerAug 10, 2026
1 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2026
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer-30B.