The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Nova 2 Sonic

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 8.7. Nova 2 Sonic is 4.3x cheaper per token.

Google · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 8.7, ranking #4 overall.

On price, Nova 2 Sonic is roughly 4.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 4 Argon also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.0 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nova 2 Sonic

  • cost matters — it's about 4.3x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
55.0
#4
8.7
#294
53.0
#6
11.2
#277
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.33 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$2.75 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Nova 2 Sonic
31.8#4
12.4#121
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 4 for Nova 2 Sonic

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2 Sonicdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova 2 Sonic costs less

For input processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens) is 6.1x more expensive than Nova 2 Sonic ($0.33/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than Nova 2 Sonic ($2.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 4 Argon is more expensive than Nova 2 Sonic.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Amazon
Nova 2 Sonic
Input tokens$0.33
Output tokens$2.75
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova 2 Sonic's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Nova 2 Sonic is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Amazon
Nova 2 Sonic
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2 Sonic support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova 2 Sonic

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova 2 Sonic

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Nova 2 Sonic was released on 2025-12-02.

Gemini 4 Argon is 10 months newer than Nova 2 Sonic.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

2 weeks ago

10mo newer
Nova 2 Sonic

Dec 2, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google. Nova 2 Sonic is available from Bedrock.

Gemini 4 Argon

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Nova 2 Sonic

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.33/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.75/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2 Sonic side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Nova 2 Sonic
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Nova 2 Sonic.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Nova 2 Sonic?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 8.7. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Nova 2 Sonic is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Nova 2 Sonic in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Nova 2 Sonic scores Big Bench Audio: 87.0%, BFCL: 74.5%, ComplexFuncBench: 65.2%, IFBench: 37.5%.

Is Gemini 4 Argon cheaper than Nova 2 Sonic?

Nova 2 Sonic is 6.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Nova 2 Sonic costs $0.33/M input and $2.75/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2 Sonic?

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1.0M tokens and Nova 2 Sonic supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2 Sonic?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.0 vs 8.7), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.33/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2 Sonic?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Nova 2 Sonic is developed by Amazon.