Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 48.5. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 15.2x cheaper per token.
Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.0 to 48.5, ranking #4 overall.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Argon wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 15.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 4 Argon also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 4 Argon
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.0 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 15.2x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 14 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Gemini 4 Argon outperforms in 5 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, DeepSWE 1.1, OSWorld 2.0, PostTrainBench, Terminal-Bench 4.0), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 4 Argon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 4 Argon is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3.1 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is limited to 524,288 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 4 Argon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 4 Argon
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 1 month newer than Gemini 4 Argon.
Sep 30, 2026
2 weeks ago
Oct 19, 2026
0 days ago
2w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.
Gemini 4 Argon
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.