The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 42.3.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 42.3, ranking #4 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Argon wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
42.3
#59
Reasoning
52.4
#7
42.8
#52
Coding
44.1
#4
29.9
#57
Agents
40.5
#4
23.7
#64
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.32 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.28 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Qwen3.7-Plus
Vision
36.8#8
32.1#26
Tool use
30.6#6
22.3#49
Long context
30.6#3
26.2#11
Multimodal
36.9#8
34.8#15
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus

1 shared

Gemini 4 Argon outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LVBench), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7-Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Gemini 4 Argon is 4 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 42.3. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 42.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons