The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs QwQ-32B

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 14.7.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 14.7, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
14.7
#248
Reasoning
52.4
#7
15.5
#239
Coding
44.1
#4
10.2
#178
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 7 for QwQ-32B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Argon supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Gemini 4 Argon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Argon is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Gemini 4 Argon is 19 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 4 Argon

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or QwQ-32B?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 14.7. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 14.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and QwQ-32B?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons