The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs QwQ-32B

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 14.7.

InclusionAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 14.7, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
14.7
#248
Reasoning
47.5
#26
15.5
#239
Coding
38.8
#18
10.2
#178
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 7 for QwQ-32B

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

527.5B diff

Ling 3.1 Flash has 527.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 1623.1% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 19 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or QwQ-32B?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 14.7. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 14.7), licensing (Unknown vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons