The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 35.8.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 35.8, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 58.8 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
58.8
#2
35.8
#106
Reasoning
54.4
#5
35.6
#105
Coding
48.3
#3
28.1
#79
Agents
45.8
#1
20.6
#87
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.17 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.34 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
MiMo-V2.5
Vision
36.0#13
24.3#71
Multimodal
38.0#6
25.9#60
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 4 Carbon · 14 for MiMo-V2.5

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Carbon is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28, while MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

6mo newer
MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Carbon
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiMo-V2.5.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Carbon or MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 35.8. Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google and MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare to MiMo-V2.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%. MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 4 Carbon supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (58.8 vs 35.8), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons