The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 48.5.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 48.5, ranking #2 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Carbon wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 58.8 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
58.8
#2
48.5
#30
Reasoning
54.4
#5
45.6
#36
Coding
48.3
#3
39.1
#23
Agents
45.8
#1
36.3
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Tool use
35.4#3
29.9#18
Safety
33.0#1
25.0#4
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 4 Carbon · 18 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

2 shared

Gemini 4 Carbon outperforms in 2 benchmarks (ExploitGym, SEC-bench Pro), while MiMo-V2.6-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Carbon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 4 Carbon is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Carbon
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Carbon or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 58.8 to 48.5. Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 4 Carbon supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (58.8 vs 48.5), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Carbon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons