The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -0.7.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -0.7, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 2 27B
Google
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.7
#346
52.1
#13
Reasoning
-1.1
#342
38.4
#71
Coding
-8.0
#278
41.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 27B and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder Full supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

Muse Wonder Full can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Muse Wonder Full uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 28 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.3 years ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

0 days ago

2.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -0.7. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.7 vs 52.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Muse Wonder Full?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons