The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs o1-pro

o1-pro leads the LLM Stats Score 19.8 to -0.6.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1-pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.8 to -0.6, ranking #197 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1-pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.8 and ranks #197 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.6
#328
19.8
#197
-1.0
#324
20.1
#188
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 2 for o1-pro

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 27B and o1-prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o1-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

o1-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while o1-pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

o1-pro is 6 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.7 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 27B

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and o1-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
o1-pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs o1-pro.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or o1-pro?

o1-pro leads the LLM Stats Score 19.8 to -0.6. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and o1-pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.6 vs 19.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and o1-pro?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.