The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to -0.7.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to -0.7, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 2 27B
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.7
#333
45.6
#29
Reasoning
-1.1
#329
42.5
#45
Coding
-7.9
#266
36.7
#21
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

281.8B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 281.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 27B, making it 1036.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 27B does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 27 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

2.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to -0.7. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.7 vs 45.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons