Model Comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Comparing Gemma 2 9B and Claude 3.7 Sonnet across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 2 9B and Claude 3.7 Sonnet don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 8 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.2 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
GoogleGemma 2 9B
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Gemma 2 9B (Google) and Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Anthropic) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Claude 3.7 Sonnet in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 9B and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens and Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic.