The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 24.2.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 24.2, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.2
#158
42.5
#45
Coding
14.0
#127
35.6
#24
Agents
5.1
#139
31.5
#26
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 19 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.5 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 24.2. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.2 vs 42.5), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons