Model Comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3n E4B InstructedWhich is better in 2026?
Gemma 3 12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 12B is 400.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed — which is better?
Gemma 3 12B (by Google) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 8 benchmarks (Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, HiddenMath, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, WMT24++), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 1 benchmark (ECLeKTic). Gemma 3 12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemma 3 12B is roughly 400.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemma 3 12B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemma 3 12B if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 9 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 400.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed if…
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 8 benchmarks (Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, HiddenMath, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, WMT24++), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 1 benchmark (ECLeKTic).
Gemma 3 12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemma 3 12B ($0.05/1M tokens) is 400.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemma 3 12B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 400.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Gemma 3 12B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 3 12B has 4.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 50.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemma 3 12B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemma 3 12B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemma 3 12B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemma 3 12B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 4 months newer than Gemma 3 12B.
Mar 12, 2025
1.2 years ago
Jun 26, 2025
11 months ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemma 3 12B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 12B's cutoff date.
—
Jun 2024
Provider Availability
Gemma 3 12B is available from DeepInfra. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.
Gemma 3 12B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 3 12B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.