The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3n E2B

Gemma 3n E2B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3n E2B is better at 1 benchmark (BIG-Bench Hard). Gemma 3n E2B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 1B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Mar 2025
Jun 2025
License
Gemma
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3n E2B is better at 1 benchmark (BIG-Bench Hard).

Gemma 3n E2B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.0B diff

Gemma 3n E2B has 7.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 700.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 3 1B does not.

Gemma 3n E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 1B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while Gemma 3n E2B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B is 4 months newer than Gemma 3 1B.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemma 3 1B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 1B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and Gemma 3n E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or Gemma 3n E2B?

Gemma 3n E2B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 1B is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and Gemma 3n E2B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.