The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 1B vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.5 to -10.3.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.5 to -10.3, ranking #10 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 1B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.5 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3 1B
Google
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-10.3
#350
51.5
#10
Reasoning
-11.9
#344
51.2
#8
Coding
-10.1
#250
40.9
#10
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 1B
Hy4 preview
Math
-8.8#314
40.3#12
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3 1B · 32 for Hy4 preview

1 shared

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy4 preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

769.0B diff

Hy4 preview has 769.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 76900.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B
770.0B
Hy4 preview

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while Hy4 preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Hy4 preview is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 1B.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.5 to -10.3. Gemma 3 1B is made by Google and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.3 vs 51.5), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 1B and Hy4 preview?

Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.

Related comparisons