The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy4 preview vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched at 49.6 and 48.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Tencent · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 49.6 and 48.7.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy4 preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
49.6
#23
48.7
#29
49.8
#15
45.9
#32
37.0
#26
37.9
#23
34.8
#27
35.7
#22
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 6
5 of 6
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Hy4 preview
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
28.9#20
27.1#27
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Hy4 preview · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

6 shared

Hy4 preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BankerToolBench), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 4 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, CyberGym, NL2Repo, PostTrainBench).

MiniMax M3.1 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy4 preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2 months newer than Hy4 preview.

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 months ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy4 preview
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy4 preview vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Hy4 preview or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 49.6 and 48.7. Hy4 preview is made by Tencent and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy4 preview compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.6 vs 48.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.