Model Comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4oWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is 35.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o — which is better?

Gemma 3 27B (by Google) and GPT-4o (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while GPT-4o is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro). GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, Gemma 3 27B is roughly 35.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemma 3 27B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 35.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4o if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while GPT-4o is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro).

GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Jun 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.20/1M tokens) is 50.0x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemma 3 27B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. Gemma 3 27B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 4,096 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Thu Jun 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and GPT-4o support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4o uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13.

Gemma 3 27B is 10 months newer than GPT-4o.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

10mo newer
GPT-4o

May 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MATH score (89.0% vs 76.6%)
Higher GPQA score (53.6% vs 42.4%)
Higher HumanEval score (90.2% vs 87.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (72.6% vs 67.5%)
GoogleGemma 3 27B
OpenAIGPT-4o

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 27B
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to GPT-4o in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. GPT-4o scores MGSM: 90.5%, HumanEval: 90.2%, MMLU: 88.7%, DROP: 83.4%, MATH: 76.6%.

Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than GPT-4o?

Gemma 3 27B is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and GPT-4o?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and GPT-4o?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $2.50/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and GPT-4o?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.