The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.5.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.5, ranking #213 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 3B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.5
#264
15.6
#213
8.8
#253
12.0
#234
5.5
#187
-6.7
#247
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 27B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
17.7#184
13.7#216
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Gemma 3 27B · 13 for IBM Granite 4.2 3B

2 shared

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

24.0B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 24.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 800.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.5. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to IBM Granite 4.2 3B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.5 vs 15.6), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM.