The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs LongCat-2.5

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 7.8. Gemma 3 27B is 5.2x cheaper per token.

Google · Meituan · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 7.8, ranking #20 overall.

On price, Gemma 3 27B is roughly 5.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • cost matters — it's about 5.2x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.8
#319
50.0
#20
8.2
#310
48.3
#21
5.2
#234
38.6
#27
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.08 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.16 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
131,072
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3 27B
LongCat-2.5
17.3#211
37.2#37
-3.1#223
32.5#29
-0.8#179
34.8#15
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Gemma 3 27B · 23 for LongCat-2.5

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 27B and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.08/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.16/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-2.5 is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.16
Best providerDeepinfra
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1573.0B diff

LongCat-2.5 has 1573.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 27B, making it 5825.9% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
1.6Tparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
1600.0B
LongCat-2.5

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Nov 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 27B and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.

LongCat-2.5 is 20 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.7 years ago

LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

4 days ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.16/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

LongCat-2.5

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
LongCat-2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs LongCat-2.5.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or LongCat-2.5?

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 7.8. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to LongCat-2.5 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%.

Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than LongCat-2.5?

Gemma 3 27B is 3.8x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08/M input and $0.16/M output via deepinfra. LongCat-2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and LongCat-2.5?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and LongCat-2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.8 vs 50.0), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.08 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Gemma vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and LongCat-2.5?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan.