The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 4B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Gemma 3 4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GSM8k, IFEval), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval). Gemma 3 4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3 4B
Google
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.04 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—
Released
Mar 2025
May 2025
License
Gemma
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GSM8k, IFEval), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

Gemma 3 4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has 3.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 75.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemma 3 4B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons